Re: [DNS] why the focus on ING?

Re: [DNS] why the focus on ING?

From: Aristedes Maniatis <ari§>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 16:35:35 +1000
Mr Bloch has done infinitely more for Australian people than you have. I
suggest that you take your insane rantings elsewhere and stop clogging up
this list.

Let me see: your signature line lists as your
personal web page.

>From whois:

Main, Dominic  dmain&#167;
    123 Domain Way
    Cleveland, Ohio 44114
    123 456 7890

Now you wouldn't be using a false address and phone number would you?
Perhaps you should review US criminal law for the definition of fraud. It is
probably the same as Australian law. You may also want to examine the
requirement of a name server for your domain: it makes it work a lot better.

If I were NetRegistry, at this point I would suing you for defamation as
well as passing off. Did you try to blackmail them into 'buying' your domain name?

Now go and bother some other people.

Ari Maniatis

on 12/9/01 3:35 PM, Dominic Main at dominic_main&#167; wrote:

> Larry Bloch is a con man, he sells canonical domain names as though
> they are real names, he does not inform his clients truthfully about
> what they are really purchasing.

ish group pty ltd
7 Darghan St Glebe 2037 Australia
phone +61 2 9660 1400   fax +61 2 9660 7400
http | email info&#167;
PGP fingerprint 08 57 20 4B 80 69 59 E2  A9 BF 2D 48 C2 20 0C C8

This article is not to be reproduced or quoted beyond this forum without
express permission of the author. 340 subscribers. 
Archived at (user: dns, pass: dns)
Email "unsubscribe" to dns-request&#167; to be removed.
Received on Wed Sep 12 2001 - 06:44:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:04 UTC