Re: [DNS] Advice on registration of recent

Re: [DNS] Advice on registration of recent

From: Craig Oehlers <info§>
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 13:48:16 +0800
Keep in mind a refund has been issued by auDA for an amount of $99.95.

I payed $60 for this domain to Explorer Domains.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Steven Heath" <sheath&#167;>
To: <dns&#167;>
Sent: Friday, August 13, 2004 1:43 PM
Subject: RE: [DNS] Advice on registration of recent

> The letter is interesting. I would like to point out what I observed
reading it.
> If the registrar had done a mistake woundnt they issue a chq for mistake
and in
> fact issue the letter?
> 9 days (August 2nd to 13th) seems short time to look at the this issue
from all
> sides.
> I think for auDA to issue could mean that the registry might have released
> name by mistake or that the orginal registrant did renew the name but a
> occurred (again likley at the registry level).
> All in all looks like someone/thing did a major screw up and AUDA rushed
of a
> letter as soon as it was reported/discovered.
> Steven Heath
> .nz news & views
> "America is the only nation in history which has gone directly from
> to degeneration without the usual interval of civilization."
> Georges Clemenceau
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> List policy, unsubscribing and archives =>
> Please do not retransmit articles on this list without permission of the
> author, further information at the above URL.
Received on Fri Oct 03 2003 - 00:00:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:07 UTC