Re: [DNS] RE: bizcatalyst.com.au

Re: [DNS] RE: bizcatalyst.com.au

From: Mark Suter <suter§zwitterion.humbug.org.au>
Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2002 17:47:00 +1000
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Folks,

Dassa <dassa&#167;dhs.org> wrote:

> A lease on premises is not always transferred to new owners
> of a business.  It is up to the owner of the property and
> the original lease agreements as to if this is possible.  A
> new lease is often negotiated.  If the existing lease allows
> for a transfer then it may take place but the original lease
> agreement has to be abided by.  An agreement is usually between
> two or more entities, you can't just replace one of them with
> another unless the agreement also includes provisions for such
> a transfer.

If the business being sold is incorporated, agreements and
licenses need not be affected --- a company has a separate legal
existence from its owners.

If Example Pty Ltd were sold, there would be no change of
registrant in the domain name licence for example.com.au --- the
registrant would remain unaltered as Example Pty Ltd.

I've search the following and I didn't find anything about the
owners (or directors) of a company changing:

    http://www.auda.org.au/docs/auda-2002-07.txt
    http://www.auda.org.au/docs/auda-2002-18.txt
    http://www.auda.org.au/docs/auda-2002-24.txt
    https://www.enetica.com.au/tc.html

Yours sincerely,

- -- Mark John Suter  | I know that you  believe  you understand
suter&#167;humbug.org.au | what you think I said, but I am not sure
gpg key id 2C71D63D | you realise that what you  heard  is not
mobile 0411 262 316 | what I meant.        Robert J. McCloskey
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Check Keyservers or http://zwitterion.org/keys/

iD8DBQE9jCP0RYso2ixx1j0RAsoWAJ4pMtb8LerEmjxz2mzVemSYo6kuBgCeLyNL
ahqEqxVTSRgXv0+PqUYlWe0=
=1KuU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Fri Oct 03 2003 - 00:00:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:06 UTC