Jon Lawrence [jon§jonlawrence.com] wrote:
> >I dont think using things in ways that where not considered as
> >necessarily abuse.  
> 
> Point taken, however in this case, it is abuse.  The grace period is for
> the cancellation of names registered fraudulently or mistakenly, nothing
> else.

again this view thats its abuse is not based on any perticular harm.

again where is the harm? not liking something is distinct from harm.

> I would rather see no grace period than the level of tasting that is currently
> going on in the .com space.
> 
> >what do you consider a reasonable cost?
> 
> The same cost as a normal registration.

thats not reasonable at all is it, give then short period its registered for.

Vic