RE: [DNS] Att: Chris D. re ING and others

RE: [DNS] Att: Chris D. re ING and others

From: Ginger Fish <ginger-fish§scifi-art.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 15:42:37 +1000
Does suspension of ING's registrar accreditation stop them from trading and
deceiving Australian consumers  in any way shape or form other than that
they can no longer promote themselves as an "Accredited Registrar"? Will it
simply be "business as usual for them"?

If so, very little has been achieved folks. Until Melbourne IT and auDA
actually get serious about cleaning up this industry and protecting
Australian consumers against deceptive marketing practices, nothing has
changed. Australian consumers will still continue to pay the price for a
self regulated industry that clearly can't regulate itself without the
masses getting burnt.

Ginger

-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Keeves [mailto:richard&#167;ibc.com.au]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 3:25 PM
To: dns&#167;lists.auda.org.au
Subject: [DNS] Att: Chris D. re ING and others


Hi Chris,
This is good news - and about time.  It will help create (and for some
people, restore) confidence in auDA and the new system.

But Ginger's comment below is right on...

Ginger wrote:
<start>
The ING suspension is one thing, but IRA etc etc .. are still out there
circulating deceptive marketing material. Is anything going to be done to
protect consumers from further deception ?
<end>

Chris,  from a legal and operational perspective,  can auDA initiate
suspension for other obvious sinners - or do you actually always have to
wait for orgs like ACCC to take action first before auDA can act?

I hope you can clarify this as,  to my mind at least, it goes to the heart
of the issue.

cheers
Richard Keeves
IBC, Perth.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Disspain" <ceo&#167;auda.org.au>
To: <board&#167;lists.auda.org.au>
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 12:46 PM
Subject: [DNS] Internet Name Group


> auDA suspends Internet Name Group following ACCC action
>
>
>
>
>
> Melbourne, 22 April 2002: auDA today suspended the provisional
> accreditation status of Internet Name Group (ING) pending the
> finalisation of the proceedings brought by the Australian Competition
> and Consumer Commission.
>
>
>
> In December 2001 ING, along with 9 other applicants, was granted
> provisional accreditation to become an auDA accredited registrar when
> the new regime is introduced.
>
>
>
> auDA has received a significant number of complaints relating to ING's
> conduct. Last week, auDA was notified by ACCC that it had commenced
> action against ING on the basis of, amongst other things, misleading or
> deceptive conduct and other offences under the Trade Practices Act 1974.
>
>
>
> auDA has now had an opportunity to examine in detail the documents
> lodged with the Federal Court by the ACCC.
>
>
>
> "Having carefully considered the matter auDA holds the view that there
> is a question as to whether ING  is capable of complying with the terms
> of auDA's Registrar Agreement and Published Policies" said auDA CEO,
> Chris Disspain. "On this basis, auDA has decided to suspend ING's
> provisional accreditation status, at least until such time as the action
> brought by the ACCC is finalised."
>
>
>
>
>
> -ENDS-
>
>
>
>
> For media contact:
>
>
>
>
> Chris Disspain
>
>
> Chief Executive Officer
>
>
> auDA
>
> tel: 03 9349 4711
>
> email: ceo&#167;auda.org.au
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------------
List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://www.auda.org.au/list/dns/
Please do not retransmit articles on this list without permission of the 
author, further information at the above URL.  (309 subscribers.)
Received on Fri Oct 03 2003 - 00:00:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:05 UTC