RE: [DNS] why not just make whatever.au available

RE: [DNS] why not just make whatever.au available

From: Harry Hoholis <webmaster§webaccess.com.au>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 16:12:09 +1000
Ari,

I am a cautious person when it comes to the management of the .au
namespace. I am trying to promote action that will prevent the
hijacking of this industry by one party bent on destruction.

Best Regards,
Harry Hoholis
http://www.webaccess.com.au



-----Original Message-----
From: Aristedes Maniatis [mailto:ari&#167;ish.com.au]
Sent: Thursday, 13 September 2001 6:33 PM
To: dns&#167;auda.org.au
Subject: Re: [DNS] why not just make whatever.au available


on 13/9/01 5:41 PM, Harry Hoholis at webmaster&#167;webaccess.com.au wrote:

> There is no mention of auction on that page whatsoever.>
> Really not that hard to see that you did not read that page.

Sigh. Why is there so much angst on this list? Given that most of us should
have parallel goals in preserving the integrity of the domain system we
should be talking about the details on how that might be done. Is everyone
here just trying to work out how to make money from the changes?

Take a look at the link I gave you, it is a summary which links to detailed
reports, including treatment of the auction process.

Here is what you asked in your original email:

> I would like a public statement from auDa as to who stands to
> benefit the most from auctioning domain names.
>
> I would like to know how it is possible that this was perceived
> to be the fairest option and how this decision came about.
>
> It is clearly an unfair process and should be seriously
> reconsidered. Why not release previously generic tagged .com.au
> domains in a similar fashion to the .biz release process.


Why don't you come up with a better proposal? You asked who stands to
benefit: it is all in the report.


> As such we have the right to this information, and I suggest that you
> respond
> appropriately. I will not tolerate sidestepping of these issues much
longer.

Actually you don't have a right to anything very much. You might have a
little better claim if you were actually a member of AuDA but the current
membership list does not contain you or your company.

So if you are not involved in the formulation of policy through membership
of the organisation, and you don't read the detailed panel reports, how
would you like the members of this list to react to your demands?

> 4. Why is the process, that you state, information for is all there,
hidden?

I presume this means you don't have enough information. Have you read the
minutes of each meeting available on the AuDA web site? (I haven't, but they
are there if you are interested).

When you have gone away and read all this:

http://www.auda.org.au/panel/name/papers/

Then come back and complain about not enough information.


Ari Maniatis


-------------------------->
ish group pty ltd
7 Darghan St Glebe 2037 Australia
phone +61 2 9660 1400   fax +61 2 9660 7400
http www.ish.com.au | email info&#167;ish.com.au
PGP fingerprint 08 57 20 4B 80 69 59 E2  A9 BF 2D 48 C2 20 0C C8

--
This article is not to be reproduced or quoted beyond this forum without
express permission of the author. 339 subscribers.
Archived at http://listmaster.iinet.net.au/list/dns (user: dns, pass: dns)
Email "unsubscribe" to dns-request&#167;auda.org.au to be removed.


--
This article is not to be reproduced or quoted beyond this forum without
express permission of the author. 337 subscribers. 
Archived at http://listmaster.iinet.net.au/list/dns (user: dns, pass: dns)
Email "unsubscribe" to dns-request&#167;auda.org.au to be removed.
Received on Mon Sep 17 2001 - 06:19:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:04 UTC