Re: [DNS] What's in a name? Too little, says panel

Re: [DNS] What's in a name? Too little, says panel

From: Doug Robb <doug§clarity.com.au>
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2000 11:38:33 +0800 (WST)
On Sun, 19 Nov 2000, Patrick Corliss wrote:

> Most significantly, the report proposes anyone applying for a domain name
> should first hold an associated trademark.
> 

Does anyone know where to get hold of a copy of the report?

The suggestion above is rather strange to say the least.

> 
> Trademarks are more expensive to obtain.
> 

But and this is the killer ... using the usual application
process they take at least a year to get .....
 
> The chair of the 30-person panel, Swinburne University academic Mr Derek
> Whitehead, said its most controversial proposal was to get rid of a ban on
> generic names. This would allow the likes of sydney.com.au to be registered.
> 

But you can't trademark generic words so suggestion
above and this one are mutually exclusive are they?

> But Mr Whitehead said no final decision would be made until a meeting on
> December 12.
> 

What power has this panel to implement any of this?

regards doug




-----------------------------------------------------------
Doug Robb
Clarity Software Pty Ltd      http://clarity.com.au
GPO Box 763                   Phone: 0403 02 2527
Nedlands 6909                 Fax:   (618) 93867564
Australia                     email: doug&#167;clarity.com.au
-----------------------------------------------------------
Received on Mon Nov 20 2000 - 11:38:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 21 2014 - 08:00:08 UTC