Re: DNS: defining "official" domains

Re: DNS: defining "official" domains

From: Adam Todd <at§ah.net>
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 1998 15:07:56 +1000
>> Like many others I have a gut feel that some domains are "official"
>> while others aren't.  It might be interesting to elaborate on what
>> this means.
>
>  If they are not in the current Legacy Root structure, than they are not
>"Official".

So if Pepsi doesn't come in a Coca Cola Bottle it's not official either.

Makes sense.  <sigh>

>> There needs to be a chain of delegation authority from IANA.  Again,
>> necessary, but not sufficient.
>
>  Which IANA?  The current version or the "New IANA"?

URGH both are non community minded.



THE DOMAIN NAME HANDBOOK                   http://www.domainhandbook.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
The advice offered in this email is not considered professional advice,
or it would be accompanied by an invoice. No permission is granted for 
republication of comments, without written consent.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Business Development, Technology Domain Registration and Network Advisory
Telstra Convey Member (not employee)	  AURSC    http://www.aursc.ah.net
Adam Todd                                 Personal http://adamtodd.ah.net  
at&#167;aus  or  at@ah.net				   http://adam.says.sheesh
Phone +61 2 9729 0565                     Network  http://www.ah.net
AU Internet News  		http://www.ah.net/lists/lwgate/INTERNET/
AU Internet User Mail List	http://www.ah.net/lists/lwgate/OZ-USER/
INTERNATIONAL ROOT SERVER CONFEDERATION MEMBER     http://www.i.rsc
Received on Fri Jun 19 1998 - 16:15:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Oct 31 2014 - 08:00:06 UTC