[DNS] Australia's luckiest man?

[DNS] Australia's luckiest man?

From: Discount Domain Name Services <rod§ddns.com.au>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 10:20:02 +1000
He's paid out $1000 to register the company and he's paid out about a $1000
for the release fee that's $2000. How many would have paid that figure to
abide by the rules! Not many I would think. Do the maths on that one!

-----Original Message-----
From: dns-bounces+simon=ddns.com.au&#167;dotau.org
[mailto:dns-bounces+simon=ddns.com.au&#167;dotau.org] On Behalf Of Skeeve Stevens
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2005 10:04 AM
To: '.au DNS Discussion List'
Subject: Re: [DNS] Australia's luckiest man?

Here here...

Who ever wrote the rules of engagement is the one who should be being
hassled.

Or are people sorry they didn't think of it? 



_______________________________________________________
Skeeve Stevens, RHCE     Email: skeeve&#167;skeeve.org
Si vis pacem, para bellum


-----Original Message-----
From: dns-bounces+skeeve=skeeve.org&#167;dotau.org
[mailto:dns-bounces+skeeve=skeeve.org&#167;dotau.org] On Behalf Of Discount
Domain Name Services
Sent: Wednesday, 31 August 2005 9:33 AM
To: '.au DNS Discussion List'
Subject: Re: [DNS] Australia's luckiest man?

Companies are legal entities under Australian law.
I think this whole thread is a bunch of sour grapes.
Bye

-----Original Message-----
From: dns-bounces+rod=ddns.com.au&#167;dotau.org
[mailto:dns-bounces+rod=ddns.com.au&#167;dotau.org] On Behalf Of Michael Purse
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2005 6:53 AM
To: .au DNS Discussion List
Subject: Re: [DNS] Australia's luckiest man?

I feel that the fact that Mr Marr has used seven different shelf companies
to enter the ballot is completely unacceptable.

I believe one of the following two courses of action should be taken:

1) Mr Marr and the 7 companies are considered a single entity, and only
Aussie Destinations (1) Pty. Ltd be allowed to register any of the domains,
and any other domains registered by Aussie Destinations
2-7 should be deleted, and a new  random ballot held.

2) Mr Marr is disqualified altogether, and all domains registered by Mr Marr
and his companies are deleted and a new random ballot held.

In either of the two circumstances, whether Mr Marr may re-enter the ballot
process should be considered carefully. It is my opinion that he should not
be permitted to re-enter, as he has flouted the rules and made a completely
mockery of the entire process.

auDA should immediately intervene and take action, and I will be phoning
auDA this morning to make my feelings clear.

Regards,

Michael Purse
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://dotau.org/



---------------------------------------------------------------------------
List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://dotau.org/

========================================================================
 iBurst Wireless Broadband from $34.95/month   www.platformnetworks.net
 Forward undetected SPAM to:                   spam&#167;mailsecurity.net.au
========================================================================

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://dotau.org/
Received on Wed Aug 31 2005 - 00:20:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:08 UTC