RE: [DNS] Advice on registration of recent

RE: [DNS] Advice on registration of recent

From: Marty Drill - Domain Candy <marty§>
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 14:15:59 +1000
I don't think there is a conspiracy theory here. Call auDA and ask the
question. They follow the rules like everybody else. If they are outside of
that they will explain. Don't pre-judge the situation without the facts

Based upon what you have said, I suggest you have a good claim to it. Again,
that is up to auDA to explain


-----Original Message-----
From: magic2147&#167; [mailto:magic2147§] 
Sent: Friday, 13 August 2004 1:56 PM
To: dns&#167;
Subject: Re: [DNS] Advice on registration of recent

On 13 Aug 2004 at 11:13, Craig Oehlers wrote:

> Recently I registered which was freely available for
registration. This domain name was one of the many drops which had a
30 day pending delete period (more than the standard 14 days) and I have
today received notification from auDA that the previous registrant remained
entitled to the registration of the domain name. Please note that a domain
name in pending delete status would have been inactive giving the previous
registrant substantial notice and opportunity to renew the domain.
> Please go to to view the letter
received from auDA.
> Can anyone shed some light on the matter? Or has anyone had any similar
> Craig

As the song says: "Better get a lawyer son. Getcha ya self a good one."

This seems to be totally unconscionable conduct on the part of some one and
very shabby treatment of yourself. No doubt some mate is getting looked


List policy, unsubscribing and archives => Please do not
retransmit articles on this list without permission of the author, further
information at the above URL.
Received on Fri Oct 03 2003 - 00:00:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:07 UTC