James,

Please post all posts beginging in point form what the rest of the post
contains.

Please, follow the format:
Tell us what you are going to tell us (In point form)
Tell us,
and if you really feel like it,
Tell us what you just told us, in summary point form to drive the point
home.

By following this form of post, it will allow anyone who IS concerned on
this type of issue to decide if they wish to read further or not, as there
are quite a few subscribers to this list who may be interested in policy
debates as such, or there might be others like myself who are more
interested in technical aspects (And i dont really like wading through too
much, im a slow reader).

E.G.

 THis post contains
   - Suggested reform #1 & backing
   - rebuttal to previous post regarding blah blah issue

 Then the body

 And if you really like, a conclusion statement that tells us the result, or
outcome you are      wishing to acheive that will benefit .au

Best regards,
Sean Finn.

-----Original Message-----
From: jamesguy [mailto:jamesguy§guyassociates.com.au]
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 10:36 AM
To: dns§lists.auda.org.au
Subject: Re: [DNS] Goodbye


That is grand coming from a Board member.  And the point is that discussion
on policy and any submissions can only be presented to members through the
policy review postings.

My submissions and anyone else's submissions should be published to open
debate.  You seem not to get it.

Further as previously stated you have the option to delete when ever a
posting comes up in my name.  So if members have no interest that is what
they will do.

Thanks for disclosing your position on public discussion.  You won't be
getting any vote from me.  That is a good reason I suppose to reject my
application for membership at the next Board meeting.  Looking forward to
doing some research on judicial revue.

> James Guy wrote:
> ] there is no way that any submissions to auda in correspondence or
otherwise would see the light of day ouside of any board meeting.
> ]
>
> By "light of day" James obviously means something other than his
submissions
> being read and considered.  Presumably he wants auDA to pay the costs to
> publish whatever he submits.
>
> Now I think I understand why Mr Guy is filling up the DNS list.
> He wants to grandstand.  If his primary objective was to get answers
> or to suggest improvements to auDA, he would use a different approach.
>
> Anyway, I've had enough of the volume on this list recently, I'm
> unsubscribing.  I might check back next month and see if traffic
> has dropped enough to get back on the DNS list.
>
>
___________________________________________________________________________
>  David Keegel <djk&#167;cybersource.com.au>  http://www.cyber.com.au/users/djk/
>  Cybersource P/L: Linux/Unix Systems Administration Consulting/Contracting
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
> List policy, unsubscribing and archives =>
http://www.auda.org.au/list/dns/
> Please do not retransmit articles on this list without permission of the
> author, further information at the above URL.  (368 subscribers.)


---------------------------------------------------------------------------
List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://www.auda.org.au/list/dns/
Please do not retransmit articles on this list without permission of the
author, further information at the above URL.  (368 subscribers.)