Re: [DNS] RE: bizcatalyst.com.au

Re: [DNS] RE: bizcatalyst.com.au

From: bw <bw§efe.com.au>
Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2002 00:05:46 +1000
No, I dont think the law (oops rule) should be in place,
if wording is a way to avoid it, they will...

if the auDA step over the line they may wear egg,

why have such a rule in the first place?
who are they to decide if your selling a private business?

Bernard Weekes


----- Original Message -----
From: "Dassa" <dassa&#167;dhs.org>
To: <dns&#167;lists.auda.org.au>
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 11:50 PM
Subject: RE: [DNS] RE: bizcatalyst.com.au


> |> -----Original Message-----
> |> From: bw [mailto:bw&#167;efe.com.au]
> |> Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 11:37 PM
> |> To: dns&#167;lists.auda.org.au
> |> Subject: Re: [DNS] RE: bizcatalyst.com.au
> |>
> |>
> |> are they going to sit at www.google.com and type in "domain
> |> au sale" each day to make sure nobody makes a cent?
> |>
> |> Bernard Weekes
>
>
> Soon organise a system to do automatic checks and web crawls.  Do you
> really want to see that happen?
>
> Darryl (Dassa) Lynch
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
> List policy, unsubscribing and archives =>
http://www.auda.org.au/list/dns/
> Please do not retransmit articles on this list without permission of the
> author, further information at the above URL.  (362 subscribers.)
>
>
Received on Fri Oct 03 2003 - 00:00:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:06 UTC