RE: [DNS] Interesting IRA

RE: [DNS] Interesting IRA

From: Phil Wright <newsstuff§network.au.com>
Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 19:53:32 +1000
for many organisations won't that be one and the same?

P

-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Fleming [mailto:kevin&#167;w617.com]
Sent: Thursday, 23 May 2002 7:39 PM
To: dns&#167;lists.auda.org.au
Subject: RE: [DNS] Interesting IRA



under the new rules (with ausregistry) - the creation date will not be
visible, just the last modification date ..


K

> -----Original Message-----
> From: C.L Ginge [mailto:cyrille.lefevre&#167;scifi-art.com]
> Sent: Thursday, 23 May 2002 12:12 PM
> To: dns&#167;lists.auda.org.au
> Subject: RE: [DNS] Interesting IRA
>
>
> Mr Hughes,
>
> >I've been recommending for yonks that the creation date not be visible.
> >From my email to this list of 3 March 2002:
>
> Well apparently you don't have much influence because the creation date is
> still displayed.
>
> >I guess I should have refrained from using 5 syllable words if I expected
> >everyone to be able to keep up.
>
> Sorry mate, lots of us didn't go to Harvard, be nice with the
> little people.
>
>
> Ginge
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Hughes [mailto:effectivebusiness&#167;pplications.com.au]
> Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 11:44 AM
> To: dns&#167;lists.auda.org.au
> Subject: RE: [DNS] Interesting IRA
>
>
> > Doing a whois on a .com.au domain name ( using aunic.net for example )
> > displays the creation date.
> > since .com.au domain names are registered for 2 years, it is
> easy to add 2
> > years to find the expiry date...
>
> I covered this in my email.....when I said
>
> > "extrapolated based on the
> > original domain name registration date"
>
> I guess I should have refrained from using 5 syllable words if I expected
> everyone to be able to keep up.
>
>
>
>
> > Which means that removing the expiry date is really
> > not sufficient to
> > prevent misuse of the data.
>
> I've been recommending for yonks that the creation date not be visible.
> From my email to this list of 3 March 2002:
>
> > A relatively effective solution appears to be to change the
> AUNIC site so
> that two of the database fields:
> >
> > * the domain name creation date
> > * the first Organisation-Postal field, which has the street address
> >
> > are not visible to manual or automated enquiries.
>
> auDA has of course nicely resolved this issue in its whois policy -
> http://www.auda.org.au/docs/auda-whois-final.pdf
>
>
>
>
> > Correct me if I am wrong.
>
> Oh, I think you're absolutely right.
>
> Maybe 'off the pace' a bit :)
>
> But right, on this one.
>
>
>
>
> Regards, Mark
>
> Mark Hughes
> Effective Business Applications Pty Ltd
> effectivebusiness&#167;pplications.com.au
> www.pplications.com.au
> +61 4 1374 3959
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------
> List policy, unsubscribing and archives =>
http://www.auda.org.au/list/dns/
Please do not retransmit articles on this list without permission of the
author, further information at the above URL.  (323 subscribers.)




---------------------------------------------------------------------------
List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://www.auda.org.au/list/dns/
Please do not retransmit articles on this list without permission of the
author, further information at the above URL.  (323 subscribers.)



---------------------------------------------------------------------------
List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://www.auda.org.au/list/dns/
Please do not retransmit articles on this list without permission of the
author, further information at the above URL.  (324 subscribers.)
Received on Fri Oct 03 2003 - 00:00:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:05 UTC