RE: [DNS] moderator

RE: [DNS] moderator

From: Ginger Fish <ginger-fish§scifi-art.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2002 12:15:15 +1100
>I've also noticed that since they've been on that list, ING is 'kind of'
>behaving itself with less unsolicited renewals going out and they're only
>pushing their business directory. Is ING behaving good until they become a
>registry??

Yeah they're playing the victim.
btw Nigel, Thanks for the disc. What are your reseller rates ?

Ginger "Just a reseller" Fish



-----Original Message-----
From: Nigel Burke [mailto:nigel&#167;avs.net.au]
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 12:04 PM
To: dns&#167;lists.auda.org.au
Subject: Re: [DNS] moderator


But who's monitoring the policy and what power do they have?

It seems that auDA can't kick them off the list, ACCC can't, who else is
there?

I've also noticed that since they've been on that list, ING is 'kind of'
behaving itself with less unsolicited renewals going out and they're only
pushing their business directory. Is ING behaving good until they become a
registry??

Regards,
Nigel
----- Original Message -----
From: "Greg Taylor" <gtaylor&#167;gil.com.au>
To: <dns&#167;lists.auda.org.au>
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 11:54 AM
Subject: RE: [DNS] moderator


> At 07:48 AM 5/03/2002, Sasha Sudakov wrote:
> >Provisionally Accredited Registrars
> >
> >"The following organisations have been Provisionally Accredited.
> >
> >This means that, subject to successfully completing the
Registry/Registrar
> >Interface Test,
> >
> >  they will be fully accredited to become operational when the new system
> >goes live." (auda website http://www.auda.org.au/transition/)
> >
> >
> >Internet Name Group
> >Namescout Corporation
> >NetRegistry Pty Ltd
> >Nexsta Communication
>
> Why is ING (nor indeed any of the other provisional registrars) not listed
> amongst the organisations that have indicated they will voluntarily comply
> with the Code of Conduct?
>
> Perhaps Clause 8 is a problem, for ING at least:
> "8. Renewal Notices
> Registrars and resellers shall not send to registrants renewal notices
that
> appear to be (or could be construed as) invoices for payment, unless the
> registrant is their customer.
> All solicitations for business should be clearly identified as such, and
> should include a statement that the registrant is under no obligation to
> respond and may choose to renew their domain name licence through their
> existing registrar or reseller."
>
> Greg
>
>
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
> List policy, unsubscribing and archives =>
http://www.auda.org.au/list/dns/
> Please do not retransmit articles on this list without permission of the
> author, further information at the above URL.  (331 subscribers.)
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------------
List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://www.auda.org.au/list/dns/
Please do not retransmit articles on this list without permission of the
author, further information at the above URL.  (329 subscribers.)
Received on Fri Oct 03 2003 - 00:00:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:05 UTC