-----Original Message-----
From: Ron Stark 
Sent: Wednesday, 28 November 2001 11:17 AM
To: 'Adam Todd'
Subject: RE: [DNS] Domain Name Management and renewal process


In the event of a change in policy, you're then advocating retrospective
compliance?

Conundrum 2001 version 3.2 ........

-----Original Message-----
From: Adam Todd [mailto:at§ah.net]
Sent: Wednesday, 28 November 2001 11:09 AM
To: Ron Stark
Cc: Nick Andrew
Subject: RE: [DNS] Domain Name Management and renewal process


At 09:54 28/11/01 +1100, you wrote:
>Andrew, I didn't know that was "the name of the game".  I thought the game
>was to web-enable those consumers that don't already have a domain name /
>web presence, i.e. growth.

Errr, if your right, why then does a name already registered need to be 
"re-registered" upon renewal and tested against the "current policy"?

What if the "current policy" dictates that a name that has been registered 
for several years no longer meets the policy?

>In your recycling "game", just how do you propose to measure the strength /
>weakness of any claim?  Wealth?  Size of organisation?  First in?
Domicile?
>Temporary inaction?  Arbitrary subjectivity?  Fame?

See ICANN.

Although ICANN has caused a far greater usage of the court system than any 
other technology related business activity.



--
This article is not to be reproduced or quoted beyond this forum without
express permission of the author. 327 subscribers. 
Archived at http://listmaster.iinet.net.au/list/dns (user: dns, pass: dns)
Email "unsubscribe" to dns-request§auda.org.au to be removed.