> From: "m&#167;rk.net" <m§rk.net>
> Reply-To: dns&#167;auda.org.au
> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 00:27:42 +1000 (EST)
> To: dns&#167;auda.org.au
> Subject: Re: [DNS] FW: uaDA Pty Ltd is not an org.au
> Resent-From: dns&#167;auda.org.au
> Resent-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 22:27:50 +0800
> 
> what would getting the domain name revoked
> achieve?

What would getting the .au redelegated achieve?

Which entity would benefit from such a redelegation?

"internet users of Australia"? No

"commercial interests in internet use in Australia"? Yes

"the public interest-- Future Users, Public Resources, etc"??? Hmmm

Why not tie any discussion of who-is-most-appropriate-delegate
to certain additional criteria (like who will guarantee to require
all .au addresses to recognise Virtual Inclusive Root addresses
and who will write to IANA/DoC/USG to request ICANN/IANA load
the virtual inclusive root (as well as .com, .net. .mil, .org and
cctlds already recognised by ICANN)?