Re: DNS: Let Kim Speak...

Re: DNS: Let Kim Speak...

From: Adam Todd <at§ah.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 1998 00:34:52 +1000
At 23:40 20/06/98 -0500, you wrote:
>On Saturday, June 20, 1998 10:47 PM, Kim
Davies[SMTP:kim&#167;gospel.iinet.net.au] 
>&#167;
>&#167;sidenote.. Six months ago I was quite happy for you to talk about AURSC and 
>&#167;float your ideas, but after months and months of your endless invective and 
>&#167;dribble it really becomes hard for someone not to grow to hate you. I really
>&#167;do hope you see that if your aim here is to rally support for your cause -
>&#167;that you're really going 180 degrees to your intended course.
>&#167;
>&#167;kim

GOSH I Don't appear to have the original to this.  Strange.

At any rate.  Kim.  Let me address your comments.

>&#167;float your ideas, but after months and months of your endless invective and 

I'm pleased you were keen initially.

>&#167;dribble it really becomes hard for someone not to grow to hate you. I really

I'm concerned you have never called or emailed me ot TRIED using AURSC to
see if the dribble (you claim) I write, actually has any subsctance.

You conducted a very inconclusive investigation into what ISPs were using
AURSC and yet failed dismally to even show 2% of the actually users.  This
evidenced that your testing was either fraudulent, or totally inconclusive.

I'm dissapointed you feel so against me, when you haven't even taken the
time to speak with me, but rather listen to the proverbial BULL SHIT (I
don't write words like that often) that the WANKERS (I try and avoid that
too) constantly push forward.

Perhaps you should have a go at AURSC, try it for two weeks and see if it
failes to operate.  I think you will be pleasantly surprised the 20 odd
requests you'll make a week to AURSC will certainly be answered in a timely
fashion, the real problems will show themselves with your services
providers and their ignorence to understand DNS.

But, it's yet again YOUR CHOICE.  

You can't attack a process you have no involvement with or have not
reasearched.  Especially when your evidence is inconclusive.  

If you really wish to pursure this course, I'll have my solicitor send you
a cease and desist letter.  You can then continue to harass AURSC, to whcih
we'll issue you a summons.

You can then present your "evidence" in court, in front of an independant
arbitrator, who has probably NO KNOWLEDGE at all.

I'll present my evidence and you can pay the bills.

Then I'll request orders that your SUPPORT AURSC and ensure you don't cross
the boundry again.

If you wish, we'll persue this course.  A Judge is going to look at you
with a very STUPID look if you walk into a court room without ever trying
to use the service you claim is a fraud.

Then again, perhaps you truely are just PLAIN DUMB STUPID.  I'm still
trying to work that out.
Received on Mon Jun 22 1998 - 02:05:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Wed Mar 26 2014 - 21:51:57 UTC