Re: DNS: defining "official" domains

Re: DNS: defining "official" domains

From: <vicc§cia.net.au>
Date: Sat, 20 Jun 1998 03:15:31 +1000 (EST)
>_From: Rick Welykochy
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, 19 Jun 1998, David Keegel wrote:
> 
> > In short, the point is that aust.com is not separated from other OzEmail
> > business, and thus aust.com domains are apparently not portable, in
> > contrast with aus.com, au.com, com.au, com, where they don't care who
> > your nameservers are or who your ISP is.
> 
> .com HAS TO DELEGATE according to the domain owner's whim
> .com.au HAS TO DELEGATE according to the domain owner's whim
> 
> .au.com does not HAVE TO DELEGATE, but it would be bad for business

yes they do, they are contractually obligated to do so!
cease spouting nonsense rick!

Vic
Received on Fri Jun 19 1998 - 16:15:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Dec 19 2014 - 20:00:11 UTC