Re: DNS: April 4th ADNA meeting

Re: DNS: April 4th ADNA meeting

From: Luke Carruthers <luke§magna.com.au>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 1997 17:30:59 +1000 (EST)
> If the ADNA is supposed to be principally a regulatory body, with licensing 
> powers deciding who will, and who will not be a DNA, surely it would be 
> inappropriate for DNA's or their employees or representatives to be on the 
> board? 
> 
> Wouldn't it be better to have the DNA's as the constituent members of ADNA, 
> and governed and managed by a board of individuals and/or organisations which,
> by definition, have no commercial interest in any individual DNA?


Under the proposed structure the DNA's must effectively be members, but
are restricted to non-voting status, and not able to perform as Board 
members.  Full details may be seen at www.intiaa.asn.au/dns.


Luke Carruthers
Magna Data
Internet Solutions Provider
Received on Thu Mar 20 1997 - 18:04:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Oct 31 2014 - 12:00:05 UTC